Thin Line Between Stupid and Clever

Opining on Whatever

Tax, Baby, Tax!

Tax! This simple three letter word is the most dreaded word in American society. It strikes fear amongst the most stalwart politicians and in turn politicians incite fear with it. Not even hotly debated issues such as abortion, second amendment rights, or controlled baby killings have an impact to the tune of the word tax. I even find myself cringing when typing the word. Why is this? Are taxes really that bad? Simply answered; it depends. However, in lieu of the recent catastrophe in the Gulf Coast, I am ever more certain that America’s dependence on foreign AND domestic oil needs to be curbed. The following is an argument for one solution in reducing consumption of oil; to raise the federal excise tax on gasoline by 8.5 cents. This increase can be found by adjusting for inflation the taxes real value since it’s last increase in 1993.

I am not advocating that a tax on gasoline is a cure all solution, however, an analysis of its affect on consumption and its potential tax revenue make a tax increase rather enticing. In the short run, the tax increase will accumulate an annual revenue of 1.15 billion dollars. The tax will increase the price of gasoline at the pump as producers will shift the tax’s statutory incidence onto consumers, however, the increase will likely be less than the full tax increase. Along with the increased tax revenue many co-benefits will be recognized. Consumers begin using alternative transportation, drive less, or drive more fuel efficient vehicles. In the long run the tax will have similar economic effects but to different degrees as demand for gasoline is more elastic. The tax’s incidence will shift back to the producers as individuals adjust their consumption behaviors as previously noted.

Environmentally, carbon dioxide emissions will be reduced to the tune of 6 million lbs per gallon per day. Additional benefits will be less traffic congestion, better road conditions, and fewer automobile accidents. The distributional issues of the increased tax on gasoline will be recognized in the primary and secondary benefits of decreased consumption. Further, the additional tax revenue can be spent in renewable energy sources or invested into the Highway Trust Fund to rebuild America’s crumbling infrastructure.

As the negative externalities of oil consumption are continually recognized by way of carbon emissions, or environmental catastrophes or middle east violence, the need for action is unequivocally today. A tax on gasoline is just a one-pronged approach to a multifaceted problem, however, its importance as a legitimate policy solution needs to be openly and honestly debated. The political in-feasibility may be at an all time low as the crisis in the Gulf Coast brings serious attention and potential action to America’s number one problem; oil dependence. I think I can hear Sarah Palin now… Tax Baby Tax!

-mheld-
Note: if anyone has questions about the math let me know and I would be glad to elaborate.

Single Post Navigation

4 thoughts on “Tax, Baby, Tax!

  1. James S. on said:

    I have no problem paying higher gasoline taxes. In fact, I have no problem with taxes at all. I don’t understand why people bitch about taxes, because how else would anything ever get done without taxes? And although the government may be a bit wasteful, the private sector tends to be as crooked as a dog’s hind leg. I’d be happy with a European-type tax system, because at least they get something for their taxes, unlike us. Call me crazy, but I like to get something for my money. But what do I know, I am handicapped by the need to be logical. Great info man.

  2. Wow, this is really well written. I’m worried it may be way too intelligent for this poor blog. I wrote something about Super Tecmo Bowl yesterday….lol. Oh, also, I agree with everything you said

  3. James S. on said:

    LOL.

  4. Michael H on said:

    J.D. I completely agree with you on the European-type of taxing. VAT (Value Added Taxes) have the advantage of being able to tax each purchase/sale through the lifespan a product before being consumed, which means each level of production and ultimate consumption bears a smaller portion of the tax, causing the tax incidence to be spread over multiple levels. This also ensures a more effective and efficient use of a product through its use. Additionally, this holds both producers and consumers responsible for a products use rather than just the consumers as in America. I could go on. Taxes are one thing that I can get behind. I suppose I have been indoctrinated by public sector influences, Cough cough graduate school. Oh well.

    Also, I thought the Super Tecmo Bowl write-up was riveting. Trust me, the food for fodder that I will regularly write about will fluctuate significantly. I was just in a good ranting mood today.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: